Mazda 3 2006 vs Audi A3 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 16 HP less power than Audi A3, but torque is 40 NM more than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
1340 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
910 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.29 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
Mazda 3 is 13 cm longer than the Audi A3, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
635 litres | 1104 litres | |
Audi A3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 469 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi A3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`825 | 1`845 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | high | |
Mazda 3 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi A3, so Mazda 3 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 6200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Audi A3 has
| |