Mazda 3 2004 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 2004 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 2004 engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda 3 2006, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mazda 3 2006. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.7 | |
|
The Mazda 3 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 2004 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2004 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2004 and Mazda 3 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
635 litres | 635 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2004 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 3 2006, which means Mazda 3 2004 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |