Mazda 3 2003 vs Mazda 3 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Mazda 3 2003 and Mazda 3 2006 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 3 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
By specification Mazda 3 2003 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2003 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
700 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2003 and Mazda 3 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
635 litres | 635 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2003 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 3 2006, which means Mazda 3 2003 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`695 | 1`725 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |