Mazda 3 2004 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
| Mazda 3 2004 engine produces 105 HP less power than Mazda 3 2006, whereas torque is 177 NM less than Mazda 3 2006. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 2004 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda Tribute | Used also on Mazda CX-7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 2004 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 3 2004 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. Mazda 3 2006 2.3 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its capacity is quite limited. The engine also requires high quality fuel and tends to use more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2004 is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 3 2006, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
878 litres | 1229 litres | |
| Mazda 3 2004 has 181 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2006. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2006 (by 351 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2004 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 3 2006, which means Mazda 3 2004 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |