Mazda 3 2006 vs Honda Jazz 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 - 265 HP | 78 - 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 - 380 NM | 110 - 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 9.7 | 5.5 - 5.8 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger, but lower. Mazda 3 is 58 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1229 litres | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 94 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mazda 3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`808 | ~ 1`465 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |