Mazda 3 2006 vs Citroen C3 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.3 - 2.3 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 84 - 265 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 122 - 380 NM | 94 - 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | 10.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 9.7 | 4.4 - 7.2 | |
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 3.85 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
Mazda 3 is larger, but lower. Mazda 3 is 57 cm longer than the Citroen C3, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 305 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1229 litres | 1150 litres | |
Mazda 3 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 79 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen C3, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`808 | ~ 1`547 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 6.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |