Mazda 2 2006 vs Mazda 3 2006

 
Mazda 2
2006 - 2007
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP105 HP
Torque: 146 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds11.7 seconds
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 2 engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 1 NM more than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.9
Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway960 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m4.42 m
Width: 1.68 m1.76 m
Height: 1.53 m1.46 m
Mazda 2 is smaller, but higher.
Mazda 2 is 50 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 268 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1044 litres635 litres
Mazda 2 has 32 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 409 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5151`725
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16001800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 2 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv