Mazda 2 2006 vs Mazda 3 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 146 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 2 engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 1 NM more than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.9 | |
Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.53 m | 1.46 m | |
Mazda 2 is smaller, but higher. Mazda 2 is 50 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 635 litres | |
Mazda 2 has 32 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 409 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`725 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | average | |
Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |