Mazda 2 2008 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda 2 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda 3 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 84 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 2 is 52 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1229 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`485 | ~ 1`808 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |