Mazda 2 2006 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.3 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 100 HP | 84 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 160 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 15.1 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 6.7 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Mazda 2 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller, but higher. Mazda 2 is 50 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1229 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 32 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 185 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`507 | ~ 1`808 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |