Lexus RX 2012 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 277 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 346 NM | 246 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 114 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 11.6 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Hilux, Toyota Tacoma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 2.7 engine: A robust and reliable engine.
Automatic transmission versions may experience increased vibration at idle. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.85 m | |
| Lexus RX is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Lexus RX is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 446 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Lexus RX has 175 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`545 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |