Lexus CT 2011 vs Volvo C30 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 99 HP | 109 HP | |
Torque: | 142 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Lexus CT engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Volvo C30. Despite less power, Lexus CT reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
By specification Lexus CT consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that by driving the Lexus CT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Lexus CT consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
1210 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
770 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo V50 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Lexus CT is 5 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus CT is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 251 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
985 litres | no data | |
Lexus CT has more luggage capacity. Lexus CT has 94 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Lexus CT is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo C30. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 1`780 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 10 000 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |