Lexus CT 2011 vs Honda Jazz 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Lexus CT is more dynamic to drive. Lexus CT and Honda Jazz have the same engine power, but Lexus CT torque is 15 NM more than Honda Jazz. Lexus CT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Lexus CT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Lexus CT consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Lexus CT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Lexus CT consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Lexus CT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus CT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Jazz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Lexus CT engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Lexus CT is larger, but lower. Lexus CT is 42 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 7 cm wider, while the height of Lexus CT is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
985 litres | 883 litres | |
| Lexus CT has 8 litres more trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus CT (by 102 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus CT is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |