Lexus CT 2011 vs Fiat Bravo 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 206 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is a more dynamic driving. Lexus CT engine produces 21 HP less power than Fiat Bravo, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Fiat Bravo. Due to the lower power, Lexus CT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Lexus CT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Lexus CT consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that by driving the Lexus CT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Lexus CT consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Lexus CT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus CT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota C-HR | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Alfa Romeo Giulietta, Alfa Romeo MiTo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus CT might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Lexus CT 2011 1.8 engine: The Toyota 2ZR-FXE is a 1.8-liter gasoline engine produced since 2009 and designed specifically for Toyota hybrid powertrains. It is based on the conventional 2ZR-FE but adapted for hybrid operation, prioritizing efficiency rather than outright performance. The engine is very economical and, with ... More about Lexus CT 2011 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus CT is 2 cm shorter than the Fiat Bravo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus CT is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
985 litres | 1175 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage space. Lexus CT has 55 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Bravo (by 190 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`845 kg | 1`785 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`410 kg | 1`260 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 435 kg | 525 kg | |
| Lexus CT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Fiat Bravo. Therefore, Fiat Bravo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |