Lexus CT 2011 vs Fiat Bravo 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 206 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is a more dynamic driving. Lexus CT engine produces 21 HP less power than Fiat Bravo, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Fiat Bravo. Due to the lower power, Lexus CT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Lexus CT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Lexus CT consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that by driving the Lexus CT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Lexus CT consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Lexus CT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus CT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Alfa Romeo Giulietta, Alfa Romeo MiTo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Bravo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus CT is 2 cm shorter than the Fiat Bravo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus CT is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
985 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage space. Lexus CT has 55 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 1`785 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |