Land Rover Range Rover 1993 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 113 HP | 91 HP | |
Torque: | 265 NM | 188 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 22 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 77 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 27 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Defender | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 5.00 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 2.07 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover is 52 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 26 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9800 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |