Land Rover Range Rover 1989 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 91 HP | |
| Torque: | 284 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 30 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 95 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 2.07 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover is 52 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
| |