Land Rover Range Rover 2006 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 640 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 129 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 310 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 63 litres | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 16 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover has 965 litres less trunk space than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1.4 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |