Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs BMW X5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 58 HP less power than BMW X5, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.5 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport and BMW X5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1750 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 164 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 37 000 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X5 has
| |