Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 125 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 175 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 435 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.59 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1585 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 145 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The Nissan Qashqai may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Qashqai scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |