Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Audi Q3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 10 HP less power than Audi Q3, but torque is 30 NM more than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.6 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi A5, Audi Q5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 11 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1525 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 61 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi Q3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Audi Q3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 32 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |