Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Peugeot 3008 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 35 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Peugeot 3008. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine Peugeot 3008 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Peugeot 3008 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Peugeot 3008 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1241 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 143 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |