Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 20 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.59 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1585 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 145 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |