Land Rover Discovery 1999 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 137 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 38 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 11.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Discovery consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Discovery over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Defender | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.86 m | |
| Land Rover Discovery and Mitsubishi Pajero are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1290 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | 2050 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |