Land Rover Discovery 1999 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 137 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 1 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 14 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Defender | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera Tino | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is larger. Land Rover Discovery is 19 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 12 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Discovery has 880 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 129 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 1.3 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Discovery can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |