Land Rover Discovery 2002 vs Nissan Terrano 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 137 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Terrano is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 17 HP less power than Nissan Terrano, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Nissan Terrano. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Defender | Used also on Nissan Patrol | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Terrano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.81 m | |
| Land Rover Discovery is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano, 12 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | 1900 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Discovery has 1175 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Terrano. The Nissan Terrano may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Land Rover Discovery can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |