Land Rover Discovery 2002 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 137 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Discovery engine produces 37 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 75 litres | |
| 940 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Defender | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is larger. Land Rover Discovery is 20 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 23 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 33 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |