Land Rover Discovery 2002 vs Hyundai Terracan 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 137 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Terracan is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 13 HP less power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Hyundai Terracan. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Discovery consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Defender | Used also on Kia Carnival | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Terracan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Terracan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.80 m | |
| Land Rover Discovery is 1 cm shorter than the Hyundai Terracan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | 1955 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Discovery has 120 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Terracan. The Hyundai Terracan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 15 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |