Land Rover Discovery 2002 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 185 HP | 249 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 64 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.6 | 13.6 | |
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Discovery consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 87 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
Land Rover Discovery is 15 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5400 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |