Land Rover Defender 1996 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 91 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 22 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 77 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 2.07 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller. Land Rover Defender is 112 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |