Land Rover Defender 1992 vs Land Rover Discovery 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.6 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Defender engine produces 24 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Defender consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Defender could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Defender consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Land Rover Defender | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 2.04 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 10 cm shorter than the Land Rover Discovery, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1970 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |