Land Rover Defender 2011 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Defender) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 246 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Defender engine produces 41 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 114 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Defender reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 12.5 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 2.7 engine: A robust and reliable engine.
Automatic transmission versions may experience increased vibration at idle. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.85 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 621 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 27 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |