Land Rover Defender 2011 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 (diesel) | 2.7 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Toyota Land Cruiser is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 163 - 282 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 - 361 NM | 246 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 7.4 - 12.5 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is larger, but lower. Land Rover Defender and Toyota Land Cruiser are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 4310 litres | 640 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1934 litres | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Defender has 3670 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`928 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 28 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |