Lada Kalina 2007 vs Renault Clio 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Lada Kalina engine produces 14 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.7 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2008 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2008 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Lada Kalina is smaller. Lada Kalina is 16 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Lada Kalina is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 439 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 89 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Clio has
| |