Lada Kalina 2007 vs Renault Clio 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Lada Kalina engine produces 31 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.7 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Renault Clio 2008 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2008 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Lada Kalina is smaller. Lada Kalina is 16 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Lada Kalina is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 439 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 89 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Clio has
| |