Kia Sportage 1999 vs Land Rover Freelander 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Kia Sportage engine produces 11 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Despite the higher power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Sportage consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sportage could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
| Kia Sportage is 6 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sportage is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |