Kia Cerato 2018 vs Mazda 3 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Kia Cerato engine produces 30 HP more power than Mazda 3, but torque is 21 NM less than Mazda 3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.1 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Cerato consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Cerato could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Cerato is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Cerato has 52 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`869 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |