Kia Cerato 2007 vs Volvo S40 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Kia Cerato engine produces 21 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Volvo S40. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 1 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 404 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Cerato has 59 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. This could mean that the Kia Cerato uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`254 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |