Kia Ceed 2018 vs Kia RIO 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 107 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Kia RIO is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed engine produces 7 HP less power than Kia RIO, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Kia RIO. Due to the lower power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Ceed consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 20 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Ceed is 19 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 10 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 395 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1291 litres | 923 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Kia Ceed has 107 litres more trunk space than the Kia RIO. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 368 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.1 metres more than that of the Kia RIO. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`760 kg | 1`600 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`185 kg | 1`079 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 575 kg | 521 kg | |
| Kia Ceed load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Kia RIO. Therefore, Kia Ceed is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia RIO has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Kia RIO has
| |