Kia Ceed 2018 vs Skoda Octavia 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, but torque is 29 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Despite the higher power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20, Hyundai Kona | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Skoda Fabia, Seat Leon, Audi A1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Octavia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Octavia 2019 1.0 engine: The VW DLAA 1.0 TSI is a three-cylinder turbocharged gasoline engine produced at Volkswagen’s Czech plant from 2020 to 2024. It was later discontinued after stricter Euro 6e emissions requirements came into ... More about Skoda Octavia 2019 1.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is smaller. Kia Ceed is 38 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Ceed is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 395 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1291 litres | 1555 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Kia Ceed has 205 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 264 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`800 kg | 1`870 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`222 kg | 1`226 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 578 kg | 644 kg | |
| Kia Ceed load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Skoda Octavia. Therefore, Skoda Octavia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |