Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Land Rover Discovery 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 6 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, but torque is 85 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used also on Land Rover Defender | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 75 cm shorter than the Land Rover Discovery, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | 1970 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 970 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Discovery. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 925 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |