Jeep Wrangler 1987 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 91 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 30 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 27 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 2.07 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 112 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1223 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |