Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 10 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 10 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 90 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1934 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 135 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`585 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 38 000 | 27 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |