Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 285 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 387 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 36 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 34 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 10.8 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 274 mm (10.8 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler Pacifica | Used also on Toyota Tundra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 548 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1059 litres | 1934 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 73 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 875 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`631 kg | 2`900 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 800 | 44 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |