Jeep Renegade 2014 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Renegade engine produces 55 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Jeep Renegade reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Renegade consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Renegade could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Renegade consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Renegade has 4x4: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Renegade can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Jeep Renegade is smaller, but higher. Jeep Renegade is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Renegade is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Jeep Renegade has 79 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 288 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Jeep Renegade can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |