Jeep Patriot 2007 vs BMW X1 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Patriot engine produces 3 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 10 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Jeep Patriot reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.7 | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Patriot consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Patriot could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW X1 2009: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Patriot engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Journey, Dodge Caliber | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X1 2010 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X1 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Jeep Patriot is smaller, but higher. Jeep Patriot is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Patriot is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 652 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1777 litres | 1350 litres | |
|
Jeep Patriot has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Patriot has 232 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The BMW X1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Patriot (by 427 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Patriot has
|
BMW X1 has
| |