Jeep Compass 2006 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 4 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.6 | |
| Jeep Compass consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2006: It has Freedom Drive I - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally the car is in front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The system is primarily designed for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. Toyota RAV4 2006: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually with a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Compass and Toyota RAV4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 1470 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 252 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 193 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 1.1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |