Jeep Compass 2006 vs Nissan Qashqai 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Compass engine produces 37 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.5 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Compass has 4x4: It has Freedom Drive I - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally the car is in front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The system is primarily designed for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Compass engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Compass is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 334 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 1520 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 243 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |