Jaguar XKR 1998 vs Jaguar XK 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.0 - 4.2 | 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 363 - 395 HP | 385 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 505 - 540 NM | 515 - 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 4.8 - 5.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 - 12.5 | 11.2 - 12.3 | |
|
Jaguar XKR petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Jaguar XKR is smaller. Jaguar XKR is 3 cm shorter than the Jaguar XK, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XKR is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 327 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Jaguar XKR has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar XKR has 27 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XK. The Jaguar XK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`057 | ~ 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XKR has
|
Jaguar XK has
| |