Jaguar XK 2009 vs Mercedes CLS 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XK is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mercedes CLS can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 5.0 (petrol) | 2.1 - 5.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 385 - 510 HP | 204 - 557 HP | |
| Torque: | 515 - 625 NM | 370 - 720 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 5.5 seconds | 4.2 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 12.3 | 5.1 - 9.9 | |
|
Jaguar XK petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
| Jaguar XK is 15 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, 15 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XK is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Jaguar XK has 220 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XK is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`110 | ~ 2`321 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |