Jaguar XK 2009 vs Jaguar XKR 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 5.0 | 4.0 - 4.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 385 - 510 HP | 363 - 395 HP | |
| Torque: | 515 - 625 NM | 505 - 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 5.5 seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 12.3 | 12.4 - 12.5 | |
|
Jaguar XK petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XKR. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Jaguar XK is larger. Jaguar XK is 3 cm longer than the Jaguar XKR, 20 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XK is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 327 litres | |
|
Jaguar XKR has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XK has 27 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XKR. This could mean that the Jaguar XK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`110 | ~ 2`057 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
Jaguar XKR has
| |