Jaguar XK 2009 vs Ford Mustang 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 5.0 | 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 385 - 510 HP | 540 - 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 515 - 625 NM | 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 5.5 seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 12.3 | 13.1 - 13.9 | |
|
Jaguar XK petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Jaguar XK is larger, but lower. Jaguar XK is 2 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XK is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 379 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XK has 79 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. This could mean that the Jaguar XK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`110 | ~ 2`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |